Recalibrating Ethical Dilemmas Using the 'Fixes that Fail' Archetype, casual loop archetype

Tracy Noga; Laurie W. Pant; Lewis Shaw

ORDER ARTICLE PERMISSIONS/REPRINTS/OFFPRINTS

To order inspection copies, and/or permissions to include this article in textbooks, edited volumes, course booklets, online/digital course packs, etc., and/or to order multiple individual hard copies for classroom use, please use the secure online payment, or the appropriate form available on the Order Forms page or alternatively, contact the Publishing Editor, Peter Neilson, pneilson@neilsonjournals.com directly.

Recalibrating Ethical Dilemmas Using the "Fixes that Fail" Archetype

Tracy Noga

Bentley University, USA

Laurie W. Pant and Lewis Shaw

Suffolk University, USA

Volume 8: 2011, pp. 63-82: ABSTRACT

People frequently make ethical choices they later regret. Causal Loop Archetypes offer a basic systems framework for analyzing the unintended consequences of personal and professional ethical decisions. Pressure or enticement or defensiveness can stymie individuals’ rational sense-making. Causal Loop Thinking, and in particular the “Fixes that Fail” Archetype, draw on the familiar decision model of identifying the problem, specifying the alternative courses of action and their consequences, to guide our final choice. As students grapple with their own conflicts and business school faculty look for tools to anticipate professional ethical dilemmas, Causal Loop Thinking can expand our awareness of the context of choices and actions, thus leading to a more fully assessed decision.