© NeilsonJournals Publishing All Rights Reserved
NeilsonJournals Publishing
The Americas + Rest of World
Minimum Order Value
6 copies:
Minimum Order Value
6 copies:
Minimum Order Value
6 copies:
ORDER ARTICLE PERMISSIONS/REPRINTS/OFFPRINTS/TEACHING NOTES
To order inspection copies, and/or permissions to include this article in textbooks, edited volumes, course booklets, online/digital course packs, etc., and/or to order multiple individual hard copies for classroom use, please use the secure online payment, or the appropriate form available on the Order Forms page, or alternatively, contact the Publishing Editor, Peter Neilson, pneilson@neilsonjournals.com directly.
Individual Decisions and Public Trust: The PCAOB and KPMG
Katherine Campbell and Duane Helleloid
University of North Dakota, USA
Volume 19: 2022 pp. 231-246: ABSTRACT
What might seem like a small ethical transgression by an individual can lead to a series of subsequent decisions, and result in serious fraud. This can not only impact the individuals involved and their organizations, but also erode public trust in firms and institutions. When Brian Sweet left a position with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), an organization that oversees the inspection of audits, and went to work for KPMG, one of the large accounting firms whose audits he had inspected, he took with him confidential information that he thought could prove useful in his new position. Sweet subsequently shared confidential information with his new employer, and over the next two years acquired additional confidential information through contacts at PCAOB. Debra Kaufmann, a KPMG audit partner, was faced with a decision about how to react when Sweet shared confidential information that she believed neither she nor KPMG should have.
ARTICLE REF.: JBEE19-0CS4
.jpg)
