© NeilsonJournals Publishing All Rights Reserved
NeilsonJournals Publishing
The Americas + Rest of World
Currency:
Handling:
Delivery:
Currency:
Handling:
Delivery:
EURO €
(included)
Electonic
Currency:
Handling:
Delivery:
ORDER ARTICLE PERMISSIONS/REPRINTS/OFFPRINTS
To order inspection copies, and/or permissions to include this article in textbooks, edited volumes, course booklets, online/digital course packs, etc., and/or to order multiple individual hard copies for classroom use, please use the appropriate form available on the Order Forms page or alternatively, contact the Publishing Editor, Peter Neilson, pneilson@neilsonjournals.com directly.
Comparing Thinking Style and Ethical Decision-Making Between Chinese and U.S. Students: Potential for Future Clash?
Charles M. Vance
Loyola Marymount University, USA
Judith A. White
St. Mary's College of California, USA
Yongsun Paik
Loyola Marymount University, USA
Lin Guo
Xiamen University, China
Volume 13: 2016, pp. 117-146: ABSTRACT
This study provides a comparison of thinking style and ethical decision-making patterns between 386 U.S. students and 506 students from the People’s Republic of China enrolled in undergraduate business education in their respective countries. Contrary to our expectations, the Chinese students demonstrated a significantly greater linear thinking style compared to American students. As hypothesized, both Chinese and U.S. students possessing a balanced linear and nonlinear thinking style profile demonstrated greater ethical intent across a series of ethics vignettes. Chinese students also were more likely to adopt an act utilitarian rationale, an ethical philosophy that in practice may violate government regulations or social rules to benefit one’s family instead of society for explaining their decisions across the vignettes. We conclude with a discussion of important theoretical as well as practical and potential future implications based on this comparative study.
ARTICLE REF.: JBEE13-0RA6
.jpg)
